X X Requires each local school district in the state to adopt and file an internet use policy with the state superintendent of public instruction. The policy, approved by the local board of trustees, shall require filtering technology that blocks internet materials that are harmful to minors, establish disciplinary measures for violators, and provide a component of internet safety to be integrated into the schools instructional program. Requires public libraries receiving public moneys that provide access to the Internet to the public to adopt an Internet safety policy that will protect against access to visual depictions that are obscene, are child pornography or are harmful to minors.
Educators discuss the plusses and minuses of the filtering software they use. Critics of the law claimed that filtering technology is inconsistent and unreliable, that it blocks student access to legitimate educational resources, and that it denies students the opportunity to learn to properly evaluate online resources.
Proponents said that the disadvantages of filtering are overstated and that any disadvantages are more than overshadowed by the need to protect students from inappropriate online materials and the need to protect educators from the possible consequences of unlimited student access to such materials.
Recently, the Kaiser Family Foundation released the results of a study on the effects of filtering software on student access to online health information.
According to See No Evil: At the least restrictive level, the filters incorrectly block an average of just 1. The amount of pornographic content blocked was found to increase only marginally, from 87 percent at the least restrictive configuration to 91 percent at the most restrictive level.
Who better to tell us than the Education World Tech Team? That is a very hard question to answer," Jayme Swinford told Education World.
As an educator, my instinct is to say no. I have a responsibility to produce active, media-literate members of society who are able to deal with any kind of information and who possess the ability to make sound decisions based on knowledge and understanding.
The disadvantage to using that service is that districts give up the flexibility of being able to customize the filtering. For example, if games are filtered because one participating district wants it, then all districts must filter games.
Often, decisions on what should be allowed are made at the regional level and not by participating districts. Each district does have an override password.
Most teachers are unaware of this, because the password is given to the technology coordinator who decides, often with administrative advice, whether or not to distribute the password. N2H2 does offer the option at the bottom of every page it blocks to have the page reviewed. It may be that filtering software or services provide a false sense of security to teachers and administrators.
No filtering system is percent fail proof.
A diligent student will be successful at locating inappropriate material if it is out there. At the same time, a student with a legitimate request for information may be unsuccessful. Unfortunately, many valid research sites are blocked along with the undesirable sites. However, filtering options may be influenced by the age of the student.
Stronger filtering may be appropriate for elementary students, as they are learning to discern and disaggregate information, while secondary students may need some flexibility to perform research pertinent to their education. With filtering in place, a district can at least demonstrate that it is taking positive action toward protecting students from objectionable information.
Young children should not be allowed to surf the Internet unsupervised; neither should older students.
The teacher or adult with the students should be aware of what is going on at all times.
In Maine, Portland Public Schools in April installed filters on high-school students’ school-issued laptops that banned access to social networks, games, and video-streaming sites. Professionally written essays on this topic: Ethics of School Filters for the Internet Controversy of Filtering Internet Access. Essay on Internet Censorship. By Lauren Bradshaw. May 25, You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, Almost everyone agrees that summer is the best time for traveling, especially considering the summer break from school. All countries welcome new visitors and are.
Too often, a lab design places the teacher at the front of the room unable or unwilling to monitor the kids. A partial solution to this problem could be adequate technology training and support for teachers from district administrators.
Another possibility is improved facility design and better management tools.The students will use the computers to search the Internet for research paper content.
The school budget is limited. Which content filtering option would you choose? An Internet filter, along with a clear Acceptable Use Policy, can help a school police what students are accessing and viewing.
That way the school is protected from complaints or even lawsuits.
"Our service unit area, which also provides our Internet access, uses the Bess Internet Filtering Service by Secure Computing. Each school district is allowed to create its own restrictions within certain categories. Sep 27, · Students, teachers, and school librarians in many schools are frustrated daily when they discover legitimate educational websites blocked by filtering software installed by their school.
Internet safety for children and adults is best addressed through educational programs that teach people how to find and evaluate caninariojana.com use of Internet filters to block constitutionally protected speech, including content on social networking and gaming sites, compromises First Amendment freedoms and the core values of librarianship.
Internet Content Filtering and Blocking. Last Updated: 11 May The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, March "In the course of a pending ACLU challenge to the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), Research paper submitted to . FILTERING CHILDREN’S ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AT SCHOOL Kathryn Moyle Charles Darwin University Australia This paper discusses intersections between the aims and purposes of schools, technical dilemmas to filtering the Internet at school.
As outlined above, this.